Official Guide Explanation:
Data Sufficiency #91

 

 

Background

This is just one of hundreds of free explanations I've created to the quantitative questions in The Official Guide for GMAT Review (12th ed.). Click the links on the question number, difficulty level, and categories to find explanations for other problems.

These are the same explanations that are featured in my "Guides to the Official Guide" PDF booklets. However, because of the limitations of HTML and cross-browser compatibility, some mathematical concepts, such as fractions and roots, do not display as clearly online.

Click here for an example of the PDF booklets. Click here to purchase a PDF copy.

 

Solution and Metadata

Question: 91
Page: 280
Difficulty: 4 (Moderately Easy)
Category 1: Geometry > Lines >

Explanation: Statement (1) is insufficient: knowing the length of the entire line doesn't help you compare the lengths of two parts of the line. Statement (2) is also insufficient: the length of AB is irrelevant to the comparison of BC and CD.

Taken together, the statements are still insufficient. Remember that illustrations in Data Sufficiency questions are not drawn to scale, so regardless of AB and CD being equal, CD could be greater or smaller than BC. (E) is the correct answer.

Click here for the full list of GMAT OG12 explanations.

 

You should follow me on Twitter. While you're at it, take a moment to subscribe to GMAT Hacks via RSS or Email.

Total GMAT Math

The comprehensive guide to the GMAT Quant section. It's "far and away the best study material available," including over 300 realistic practice questions and more than 500 exercises!
Click to read more.