### Bookshelf

Total GMAT MathJeff's complete Quant guide, on sale now! |

Total GMAT VerbalEverything you need to ace GMAT Verbal! |

New: GMAT 111Improve every aspect of your GMAT prep! |

Guides To the Official Guide

(Updated for new editions!)

1,800 Practice Quant Questions

**GMAT Question of the Day**

GMAT Official Guide

OG Math | OG Verbal

Beginner's Guide to the GMAT

GMAT Hacks Affiliate Program

### Categories

- General Study Tips
- Goals and Planning
- CAT Strategy
- The Mental Game
- GMAT Math Strategy
- GMAT Math Topics
- Mental Math
- Data Sufficiency
- Critical Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- Sentence Correction
- Analytical Writing Assessment
- Business School Admissions
- GMAT Prep Resources
- Practice Questions
- Total GMAT Math
- Total GMAT Verbal

## Official Guide Explanation:

Data Sufficiency #70

**Background**

This is just one of hundreds of free explanations I've created to the quantitative questions in The Official Guide for GMAT Quantitative Review (2nd ed.). Click the links on the question number, difficulty level, and categories to find explanations for other problems.

These are the same explanations that are featured in my "Guides to the Official Guide" PDF booklets. However, because of the limitations of HTML and cross-browser compatibility, some mathematical concepts, such as fractions and roots, do not display as clearly online.

Click here for an example of the PDF booklets. Click here to purchase a PDF copy.

**Solution and Metadata**

**Question****: 70**

Page: 158

Difficulty: **6** (Moderately Difficult)

Category 1: Arithmetic > Real Numbers >

Category 2: Arithmetic > Properties of Integers > Factors and Multiples

**Explanation:** This is an unusual, tricky question. It takes some experimentation to figure out what the rules mean. Let's say 5 is in K. Then -5 is in K as well. Based on (ii), if 5 and -5 are in K, then -25 is in K. Add another number, and the possibilities multiply, quite literally.

Statement (1) is insufficient. If 2 is in K, -2 is in K, as is -4, as well as 8 and -8. Note the pattern: These are all positive and negative powers of 2. 12 is not a power 2, so we don't know that 12 is in K. However, there could be other numbers besides the powers of 2, so we can't answer the question.

Statement (2) is insufficient for the same reason. Here we can only be confident about the presence of powers of 3. We know 3, -3, 9, 27, -27, etc. are present.

Taken together, the statements are sufficient. (1) established that -4 is in K, while (2) told us that -3 is in K. Since if two numbers are in K, their product is in K as well (rule (ii)), 12 is in K. Choice (C) is correct.

Click here for the full list of GMAT Quant Review explanations.

You should follow me on Twitter. While you're at it, take a moment to
subscribe to
GMAT Hacks via RSS or Email. |

Total GMAT Math
The comprehensive guide to the GMAT Quant section. It's "far and away the best study material
available," including over 300 realistic practice questions and more than 500 exercises! |