Bookshelf
Total GMAT Math Jeff's complete Quant guide, on sale now! |
Total GMAT Verbal Everything you need to ace GMAT Verbal! |
New: GMAT 111 Improve every aspect of your GMAT prep! |
Guides To the Official Guide
(Updated for new editions!)
1,800 Practice Quant Questions
GMAT Question of the Day
GMAT Official Guide
OG Math | OG Verbal
Beginner's Guide to the GMAT
GMAT Hacks Affiliate Program
Categories
- General Study Tips
- Goals and Planning
- CAT Strategy
- The Mental Game
- GMAT Math Strategy
- GMAT Math Topics
- Mental Math
- Data Sufficiency
- Critical Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- Sentence Correction
- Analytical Writing Assessment
- Business School Admissions
- GMAT Prep Resources
- Practice Questions
- Total GMAT Math
- Total GMAT Verbal
Official Guide Explanation:
Data Sufficiency #70
Background
This is just one of hundreds of free explanations I've created to the quantitative questions in The Official Guide for GMAT Quantitative Review (2nd ed.). Click the links on the question number, difficulty level, and categories to find explanations for other problems.
These are the same explanations that are featured in my "Guides to the Official Guide" PDF booklets. However, because of the limitations of HTML and cross-browser compatibility, some mathematical concepts, such as fractions and roots, do not display as clearly online.
Click here for an example of the PDF booklets. Click here to purchase a PDF copy.
Solution and Metadata
Question: 70
Page: 158
Difficulty: 6 (Moderately Difficult)
Category 1: Arithmetic > Real Numbers >
Category 2: Arithmetic > Properties of Integers > Factors and Multiples
Explanation: This is an unusual, tricky question. It takes some experimentation to figure out what the rules mean. Let's say 5 is in K. Then -5 is in K as well. Based on (ii), if 5 and -5 are in K, then -25 is in K. Add another number, and the possibilities multiply, quite literally.
Statement (1) is insufficient. If 2 is in K, -2 is in K, as is -4, as well as 8 and -8. Note the pattern: These are all positive and negative powers of 2. 12 is not a power 2, so we don't know that 12 is in K. However, there could be other numbers besides the powers of 2, so we can't answer the question.
Statement (2) is insufficient for the same reason. Here we can only be confident about the presence of powers of 3. We know 3, -3, 9, 27, -27, etc. are present.
Taken together, the statements are sufficient. (1) established that -4 is in K, while (2) told us that -3 is in K. Since if two numbers are in K, their product is in K as well (rule (ii)), 12 is in K. Choice (C) is correct.
Click here for the full list of GMAT Quant Review explanations.
You should follow me on Twitter. While you're at it, take a moment to subscribe to GMAT Hacks via RSS or Email. |
Total GMAT Math
The comprehensive guide to the GMAT Quant section. It's "far and away the best study material
available," including over 300 realistic practice questions and more than 500 exercises! |